A strong first move is to inspect a few actual rows. Sample rows often reveal blanks, inconsistent formatting, strange categories, odd encodings, or surprising values much faster than a schema alone.
This matters because column names can sound trustworthy while the values tell a different story. A field called `priority_score` sounds clean until the learner notices values like `high`, `n/a`, and `-4` mixed into the same column. A field called `region` sounds harmless until the rows show `North`, `north`, `NORTH`, and one empty value.
Real examples show the learner what the dataset actually contains. They help the learner stop trusting the headers alone and start reading the evidence inside the rows.
Sample rows do not prove everything is healthy, but they are one of the best ways to ground the inspection process.